ISBN: 978-80-244-5727-7 | ISBN online: 978-80-244-5728-4 | DOI: 10.5507/pdf.20.24457277

Quantitative lingustic analysis of Czech sign language

Jiří Langer, Jan Andres, Martina Benešová, Dan Faltýnek



The main aim of this book is to present current research outcomes from quantitative analysis of Czech sign language. A multidisciplinary research project entitled “The Theoretical Basis for Teaching Czech Sign Language Tested through Quantitative Linguistic Methods” was carried out by researchers from three faculties of Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. It is the first attempt in the field of quantitative linguistics applied to a sign language. The authors believe that their book can serve at least as an introduction for further steps in this meritorious interdisciplinary area.

1. edition, Published: 2020, online: 2020, publisher: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Křížkovského 8, 771 47 Olomouc



References

  1. [Altmann, 1980] Altmann, G. (1980). Prolegomena to Menzerath's law. Glottometrika 2, 1-10.
  2. [Altmann, 2002] Altmann, G. (2002). Einführung in die quantitative Lexikologie. Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.
  3. [Altmann, 2012] Altmann, G. (2012). Certain differences between qualitative and quantitative linguistics. Czech and Slovak Linguistics Review 1, 6-15.
  4. [Altmann, Schwibbe, Kaumanns, 1989] Altmann, G., Schwibbe, M.H., Kaumanns, W. (Eds.) (1989). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz in informationsverarbeitenden Systemen. Hildesheim: Olms.
  5. [Andres, 2009] Andres, J. (2009). On de Saussure's principle of linearity and visualization of language structures. Glottotheory 2(2), 1-14. Go to original source...
  6. [Andres, 2010] Andres, J. (2010). On a conjecture about the fractal structure of language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 17(2), 101-122. Go to original source...
  7. [Andres, 2014] Andres, J. (2014). The Moran-Hutchinson formula in terms of Menzerath-Altmann's law and Zipf-Mandelbrot's law. In: Altmann, G., Čech, R., Mačutek, J., Uhlířová, L. (eds.): Empirical Approaches to Text and Language Analysis. Studies in Quantitative Linguistics 17, Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag, pp. 29-44.
  8. [Andres, Benešová, 2011] Andres, J., Benešová, M. (2011). Fractal analysis of Poe's Raven. Glottometrics 21, 73-98.
  9. [Andres, Benešová, 2012] Andres, J., Benešová, M. (2012). Fractal analysis of Poe's Raven, II. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 19(4), 301-324. Go to original source...
  10. [Andres et al., 2012a] Andres, J., Benešová, M., Kubáček, L., Vrbková, J. (2012). Methodological note on the fractal analysis of texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 19(1), 1-31. Go to original source...
  11. [Andres et al., 2012b] Andres, J., Kubáček, L., Machalová, J., Tučková, M. (2012). Optimization of parameters in the Menzerath-Altmann law. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Fac. rer. nat., Math. 51(1), 5-27.
  12. [Andres et al., 2014] Andres, J., Benešová, M., Chvosteková, M., Fišerová, E. (2014). Optimization of parameters in the Menzerath-Altmann law, II. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc, Fac. rer. nat., Mathematica 53 (2), 5-28.
  13. [Andres, Benešová, Langer, 2019] Andres, J., Benešová, M., Langer, J. (2019). Towards a fractal analysis of the sign language. J. Quantitative Linguist., 1-18 doi:10.1080/09296174.2019.1656149. Go to original source...
  14. [Andres, Langer, Matlach, 2020] Andres, J., Langer, J., Matlach, V. (2020). Fractal-based analysis of sign language. Commun. Nonlin. Sci. Numer. Simul. 84, 105214, 1-14. Go to original source...
  15. [Andres, Rypka, 2012] Andres, J., Rypka, M. (2012). Self-similar fractals with a given dimension and the application to quantitative linguistics. Nonlinear Analysis - B: Real World Applications 13(1), 42-53. Go to original source...
  16. [Ausloos, 2012a] Ausloos, M., (2012). Generalized Hurst exponent and multifractal function of original and translate texts mapped into frequency and length time series. Phys. Rev. E 86, 1-9. Go to original source...
  17. [Ausloos, 2012b] Ausloos, M. (2012). Measuring complexity with multifractals in texts. Translation effects. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 45 (11), 1349-1357. Go to original source...
  18. [Baayen et al., 2002] Baayen, R. H., Halteren, H. Van, Neijt, A., Tweedie F. (2002). An experiment in authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of JADT 2002, St. Malo, pp. 29-37.
  19. [Baixeries et al., 2013] Baixeries, J., Hernández-Fernández, A., Forns, N., Ferrer-i- Cancho, R. (2013). The Parameters of Menzerath-Altmann Law in Genomes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20(2), 94-104. Go to original source...
  20. [Baláž et al., 1988] Baláž, J. et al. (1988). Interpersonálna komunikácia a jej poruchy [Interpersonal communication and its disorders]. Bratislava: SPN.
  21. [Barnsley, 2013] Barnsley, M.F. (2013). Fractals Everywhere: New Edition. Mineola, N.Y: Courier Dover Publications.
  22. [Battison, 1978] Battison, R. (1978). Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Springs: Linstok Press.
  23. [Bellugi, Fischer, 1972] Bellugi, U., Fischer, S. (1972). A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition 1(2-3), 173-200. Go to original source...
  24. [Benešová, Faltýnek, Hadwiger, 2014] Benešová, M.; Faltýnek, D.; Hadwiger, L. (2014). Menzerath-Altmann law in differently segmented texts. In: Qualico 2014. Olomouc: Palacky University. Go to original source...
  25. [Bianchi, Pianese, 2018] Bianchi, S., Pianese, A. (2018). Time-varying Hurst-Hölder exponents and the dynamics of (in)efficiency in stock markets. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 109, 64-75. Go to original source...
  26. [Biberauer, Roberts, 2013] Biberauer, T., Roberts, I. (Eds.) (2013). Challenges to Linearization. Berlin: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
  27. [Bímová, 2002] Bímová, P. (2002). Jazyk znakový - jazyk přirozený [Sign Language - Natural Language]. Čestina doma a ve svetě 10, 100-103.
  28. [Binongo, 2003] Binongo, J.N.G. (2003).Who wrote the 15th book of Oz? An application of multivariate analysis to authorship attribution. Chance 16(2), 9-17. Go to original source...
  29. [Bolshoy, 2003] Bolshoy, A. (2003). DNA sequence analysis linguistic tools: contrast vocabularies, compositional spectra and linguistic complexity. Applied bioinformatics 2, 103-112.
  30. [Brennan et al., 1990] Brennan, M. et al. (1990). Words in hand. A structural analysis of the signs of British Sign Language. Edinburgh: Moray House College of Education.
  31. [Brentari, 2011] Brentari, D. (2011). Handshape in Sign Language Phonology. In: Companion to Phonology, Oxford University Press, pp. 195-222. Go to original source...
  32. [Brentari et al., 2011] Brentari, D., Coppola, M., Whan Cho, P., Senghas, A. (2017). Handshape Complexity as a Precursor to Phonology: Variation, Emergence, and Acquisition. Language Acquisition 24(4), 1-24. Go to original source...
  33. [Burrows, 2003] Burrows, J. (2003). Questions of Authorships: Attribution and Beyond. Computersand the Humanities 37(1), 5-32. Go to original source...
  34. [Chatterjee, Hadi, 2006] Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S. (2006). Regression Analysis by Example. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Go to original source...
  35. [Chomsky, 2002] Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures. Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  36. [Colville, 1986] Colville, M.D. (1986). The Edinburgh non-manual coding system (ENCS). In: Tervoort, B.T. (ed.), Signs of life. Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, Amsterdam July 14-18, 1985. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, pp. 204-208.
  37. [Cramer, 2005] Cramer, I. (2005). The parameters of the Altmann-Menzerath law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 12(1), 41-52. Go to original source...
  38. [Čermák, 2001] Čermák, F. (2001). Jazyk a jazykověda. Prěhled a slovníky [Language and linguistics. Overview and dictionaries]. Praha: Karolinum.
  39. [Černý, 1997] Černý, J. (1997). Úvod do studia jazyka [Introduction to the study of language]. Olomouc: Rubico.
  40. [Červenková, 1997] Červenková, A. (1997) Výzkum znakového jazyka [Sign language research]. Info zpravodaj - magazín informačního centra o hluchotě 5(2), 6-8.
  41. [Diederich, Kindermann, Paass, 2003] Diederich, J., Kindermann, E., Paass, G. (2003). Authorship attribution with support vector machines. Applied Intelligence, 19(1-2), 109-123. Go to original source...
  42. [Damerau, 1964] Damerau, F.J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM 7(3), 171-176. Go to original source...
  43. [De Saussure, 2008] De Saussure, F. (2008). Kurs obecné lingvistiky. 3. vyd. [General linguistics course. 3rd edition]. Praha: Academia.
  44. [Draves et al., 1964] Draves, S., Abraham, R., Viotti, P, Abraham, F.D., Sprott, J.C. (2008). The aesthetics and fractal dimension of electric sheep. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 18(4), 1243-1248. Go to original source...
  45. [Droždž et al., 2016] Droždž, S., Oświecimka, P., Kulig, A., Kwapień, J., Bazarnik, K., Grabska-Gradzińska, I., Rybicki, J., Stanuszek, M. (2016). Quantifying origin and character of long-range correlations in narrative texts. Information Sciences 331, 32- 44. Go to original source...
  46. [Eisenhauer, 2003] Eisenhauer, J.G. (2003). Regression through the Origin. Teaching Statistics 25, 76-80. Go to original source...
  47. [Efron, Tibshirani, 1993] Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, N.Y.: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Go to original source...
  48. [Eftekhari, 2006] Eftekhari, A. (2006). Fractal geometry of texts: First attempt to Shakespeare's. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 13(2-3), 177-193. Go to original source...
  49. [Engberg-Pedersen, 1986] Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1986). The Use of Space with Verbs in Danish Sign Language. In: Tervoort, B.T. (ed.), Signs of life. Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, Amsterdam July 14-18, 1985. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, pp. 32-41.
  50. [Engberg-Pedersen, Hansen, 1986] Engberg-Pedersen, E., Hansen, B. (1986). Workshop II, 1. 30 Signs from Danish Sign Language. In: Tervoort, B.T. (ed.), Signs of life. Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, Amsterdam July 14-18, 1985. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, pp. 209-217.
  51. [Eroglu, 2014] Eroglu, S. (2014). Self-organization of genic and intergenic sequence lengths in genomes: Statistical properties and linguistic coherence. Complexity 21(1), 268-282. Go to original source...
  52. [Evans, 2001] Evans, L. (2001). Totální komunikace, struktura a strategie [Total communication: structure and strategy]. Hradec Králové: Pedagogické centrum.
  53. [Feder, 1988] Feder, J. (1988). Fractals. New York: Plenum Press. Go to original source...
  54. [Fedurek, Zuberbühler, Semple, 2017] Fedurek, P., Zuberbühler, K., Semple, S. (2017). Trade-offs in the production of animal vocal sequences: insights from the structure of wild chimpanzee pant hoots. Frontiers in Zoology 14, 50. Go to original source...
  55. [Ferrer-i-Cancho, Elvevag, 2010] Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Elvevag, B. (2010). Random Texts Do Not Exhibit the Real Zipf's Law-Like Rank Distribution. PLoS ONE, vol. 5, e9411. Go to original source...
  56. [Ferrer-i-Cancho et al., 2013] Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Forns, N., Hernández-Fernández, A., Bel-Enguix, G., Baixeries, J. (2013). The Challenges of Statistical Patterns of Language: The Case of Menzerath's Law in Genomes. Complexity 18(3), 11-17. Go to original source...
  57. [Freeman, Carbin, Boese, 1992] Freeman, R.D., Carbin, C.F., Boese, R.J. (1992). Tvé dítě neslyší? [Can't Your Child Hear] Praha: FRPSP.
  58. [Frosini, 1991] Frosini, P. (1991). Measuring shapes by size functions. In: Proceedings of SPIE on Intelligent Robotics and Computer Vision X, Vol. 1607, Boston, pp. 3-26. Go to original source...
  59. [Frosini, Landi, 2001] Frosini, P., Landi, C. (2001). Size functions and formal series. Applicable Algebra in Engin. Communic. Comput. 12, 327-349. Go to original source...
  60. [Gregory et al., 2001] Gregory, S. et al. (2001). Problémy vzdělávání sluchově postižených [Issues in Deaf education]. Praha: FF UK.
  61. [Gustison et al., 2016] Gustison, M.L., Semple, S., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Bergman, T.J. (2016). Gelada vocal sequences followMenzerath's linguistic law. In: Dorothy L. Cheney (ed.): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113(19), E2750- E2758. Go to original source...
  62. [Hadler, Irrgang, 2014] Hadler, F., Irrgang, D. (2014). Nonlinearity, multilinearity, simultaneity: notes on epistemological structures. In: (Moura, H., Sternberg, R., Cunha, R., Queiroz, C., Zeilinger, M. (eds.): Interactive Narratives, New Media & Social Engagement, Toronto: Univ. of Toronto, pp. 70-87.
  63. [Handouyahia, Ziou, Wang, 1999] Handouyahia, M., Ziou, D.,Wang, S. (1999). Sign language recognition using movement-based size functions. In: Proceedings of Vision Interface '99 (Trois-Rivières, Canada, 19-21 May), Canadian Image Processing and Pattern Recognition Society, pp. 210-216.
  64. [Haspelmath, Tadmor, 2009] Haspelmath, M., Tadmor, U. (Eds.) (2009). Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  65. [Hattala, 1870] Hattala, M. (1870). Počátečné skupeniny souhlásek československých (Initial consonant clusters in Czechoslovak). Praha: Kr. české spol. nauk.
  66. [Havlin et al., 1995] Havlin, S., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Mantegna, R.N., Peng, C.K., Simons, M., Stanley, H.E. (1995). Statistical and Linguistic Features of DNA Sequences. Fractals 3(2), 269-284. Go to original source...
  67. [den Heijer, Eiben, 2010] Heijer, E., den, Eiben, A.E. (2010). Comparing aesthetic measures for evolutionary art. In: Di Chio, C. et al. (eds.): Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Proceedings of the Conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computation EvoApplications 2010: EvoCOMNET, EvoENVIRONMNET, EvoFIN, EvoMUSART, and EvoTRANSLOG (Istanbul, Turkey, April 2010), Part II, LNCS 6025, Berlin: Springer, pp. 311-320. Go to original source...
  68. [Hockett, 1982] Hockett, C.F. (1982). The view from language: Selected Essays, 1948- 1974. Language 58(3), 686-690. Go to original source...
  69. [Hointing, Slobin, 2002] Hointing, N., Slobin, D.I. (2002). Transcription as a tool for understanding the Berkeley transcription system for sign language research (BTS) [online]. [2006-01-26]. Avaliable at: http://ihd.berkeley.edu/btsforsignlanguage.pdf. Go to original source...
  70. [Holmes, Robertson, Paez, 2001] Holmes, D. I., Robertson, M., Paez, R. (2001). Stephen crane and the new-york tribune: A case study in traditional and non-traditional authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 35(3), 315-331. Go to original source...
  71. [Holubová, 2006] Holubová, M. (2006). Prostor v českém znakovém jazyce [Space in Czech sign language] [online]. [2012-07-15]. Avaliable at: http://ruce.cz/clanky/42prostor-v-ceskem-znakovem-jazyce.
  72. [Homoláč, 1998] Homoláč, J. (1998). Komunikace neslyšících. Sociolingvistika (antologie textů) [Communication of the deaf. Sociolinguistics (anthology of texts)]. Praha: FF UK.
  73. [Hronová, 2002] Hronová, A. (2002). Poznáváme český znakový jazyk III. (Tvoření tázacích vět) [We get to know Czech sign language III. (Forming question sentences)]. Speciální pedagogika, 12(2), 113-123.
  74. [Holubová, Motejzíková, 2002] Hronová, A.; Motejzíková, J. (2002). Raná komunikace mezi matkou a dítětem [Early communication between mother and child]. Praha: FRPSP.
  75. [Hrubý, 1999] Hrubý, J. (1999). Průvodce neslyšících a nedoslýchavých po jejich vlastním osudu - 1. díl [Guide to the Deaf and Hard of Hearing of Their Own Destiny - Part 1]. 2nd edition, Praha: FRPSP.
  76. [Hřebíček, 1990] Hřebíček, L. (1990). The constants of Menzerath-Altmann's law. Glottometrika 12, 61-71. Go to original source...
  77. [Hřebíček, 1992] Hřebíček, L. (1992). Text in Communication: Supra-Sentence Structures. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
  78. [Hřebíček, 1994] (1994). Fractals in language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1(1), 82-86. Go to original source...
  79. [Hřebíček, 1995] Hřebíček, L. (1995). Text Levels. Language Constructs, Constituents and the Menzerath-Altmann Law. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
  80. [Hřebíček, 1997] Hřebíček, L. (1997). Lectures on Text Theory. Prague: The Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic (Oriental Institute).
  81. [Hřebíček, 1998a] (1998). Hurst's indicators and text. Some properties of word-frequency series. In: Altmann, J., Koch, W. A. (eds.), Systems. New Paradigma for the Human Sciences. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, pp. 572-588. Go to original source...
  82. [Hřebíček, 1998b] (1998). Language fractals and measurement in texts. Archiv orientální 66, 233-242.
  83. [Hřebíček, 2000] Hřebíček, L. (2000). Variation in Sequences. Oriental Institute Prague, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague.
  84. [Hřebíček, 2002] Hřebíček, L. (2002). Vyprávění o lingvistických experimentech s textem [Stories about Linguistics Experiments with the Text]. Praha: Academia (in Czech).
  85. [Hřebíček, 2007] Hřebíček, L. (2007). Text in Semantics. Prague: The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Oriental Institute).
  86. [Hřebíček, 2007b] Hřebíček, L. (2007). Semantic slaps in text structures. Slovo a slovesnost 68, 83-90 (in Czech).
  87. [Hřebíček, 2008] Hřebíček, L. (2008). Filologie versus lingvistika [Filology vs. linguistics]. Vesmír 87, 488, [online] [cit. 2011-08-23].
  88. [Hurst, 1951] Hurst, H.E. (1951). Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions 350 of American Society of Civil Engineers 116, 770-799. Go to original source...
  89. [Hurst, Black, Simaika, 1965] Hurst, H.E., Black, R.F., Simaika, Y.M. (Eds.) (1965). Long-Term Storage: An Experimental Study. Constable, London.
  90. [Hutchinson, 1981] Hutchinson, J.E. (1981). Fractals and self similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30, 713-747. Go to original source...
  91. [Jabůrek, 2004] Jabůrek, J. (1998). Bilingvální vzdělávání neslyšících [Bilingual education of the deaf]. Praha: Septima.
  92. [Janovcová, 2004] Janovcová, Z. (2004). Alternativní a augmentativní komunikace [Alternative and augmentative communication]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  93. [Jammer, 2006] Jammer, M. (2006). Concepts of Simultaneity: From Antiquity to Einstein and Beyond. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Univ. Press.
  94. [Jašíčková, Benešová, Faltýnek, 2013] Jašíčková, A., Benešová, M., Faltýnek, D. (2013). An application of the Menzerath-Altmann law to a sample produced by an aphasic patient. Czech and Slovak Lingvistic Review 2.
  95. [Johnston, Schembri, 2007] Johnston, T., Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  96. [Joshua et al., 2018] Joshua, J., Borneman, D., Malaia, E., Wilbur, R.B. (2018). Motion characterization using optical flow and fractal complexity. Journal of Electronic Imaging 27, 5, 051229, 1-6. Go to original source...
  97. [Juola, 2006] Juola, P. (2006). Authorship attribution. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 1(3), DOI: 10.1561/1500000005. Go to original source...
  98. [Juola, Baayen, 2003] Juola, P., Baayen, H. (2003). A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship identification by cross-entropy. Literary and Linguistic Computing 20, 59- 67. Go to original source...
  99. [Käding, 1897] Käding, F.W. (1897). Häufigkeitswörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Steglitz.
  100. [Karlík, Nekula, Pleskalová et al., 2002] Karlík, P.,Nekula,M., Pleskalová, J. et al. (Eds.) (2002). Encyklopedický slovník češtiny [Encyclopedic dictionary of Czech]. Praha: Lidové noviny.
  101. [Karlík, Nekula, Pleskalová, 2020] Karlík, P., Nekula, M., Pleskalová, J. (Eds.) (2020). Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny [New encyclopedic dictionary of Czech]. Praha: Lidové noviny.
  102. [Klima, Bellugi, 1979] Klima, E.S., Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  103. [Köhler, 1982] Köhler, R. (1982). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz auf Satzebene. Glottometrika 4, 103-113. Go to original source...
  104. [Köhler, 1984] Köhler, R. (1984). Zur Interpretation des Menzerathschen Gesetzes. Glottometrika 6, 177-183.
  105. [Köhler, 1989] Köhler, R. (1989). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz als Resultat des Sprachverarbeitungsmechanismus. In: Altmann, G., Schwibbe, M.H. (eds.): Das Menzerathsche Gesetz in informations - verarbeitenden Systemen. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 108- 116.
  106. [Köhler, 1995] Köhler, R. (1995). Maßeinheiten, Dimensionen und fraktale Strukturen in der Linguistik. Zeitschrift für Empirische Textforschung 2, 5-6.
  107. [Köhler, 1997] Köhler, R. (1997). Are there fractal structures in language? Units of measurement and dimensions in linguistics. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 4(1-3), 122-125. Go to original source...
  108. [Köhler, 2008] Köhler, R. (2008). The fractal dimension in script: an experiment. In: Altmann, G., Feng Xiang, F. (eds.), Analysis of Script, Properties of Characters and Writing Systems. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 115-120.
  109. [Köhler, 2014] Köhler, R. (2014). The fractal structure of linguistic motifs. In: Altmann, G. et al. (eds.), Empirical Approaches to Text and Language Analysis. Lidenscheid: RAM-Verlag, pp. 94-104.
  110. [Köhler, Altmann, Piotrowski, 2005] Köhler, R., Altmann, G., Piotrowski, R.G. (Eds.), (2005). Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 27). Go to original source...
  111. [Köhler, Hoffmann, 1995] Köhler, R., Hoffmann, C. (Eds.) (1995). Bibliography of Quantitative Linguistics. Amsterdam: J. Benjamin Publ. Co. Go to original source...
  112. [Koluchová, 1989] Koluchová, J. et al. (1989). Přehled patopsychologie dítěte II [Overview of child pathopsychology II]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  113. [Komenský, 1959] Komenský, J.A. (1959). Janua linguarum reserata. Praha: SPN.
  114. [Krahulcová, 2002] Krahulcová, B. (2002). Komunikace sluchově postižených [Communication of the hearing impaired]. 2nd edition, Praha: Karolinum.
  115. [Kremers, 2009] Kremers, J. (2009). Recursive linearization. The Linguistic Review 26(1), 135-166. Go to original source...
  116. [Kremers, 2012] Kremers, J. (2012). The syntax of simultaneity. Lingua 122(9), 979- 1003. Go to original source...
  117. [Křivohlavý, 1988] Křivohlavý, J. (1988). Jak si navzájem lépe porozumíme [How we better understand each other]. Praha: Svoboda.
  118. [Kubáček, Kubáčková, 2000] Kubáček, L., Kubáčková, L. (2000). Statistics and Metrology. Olomouc: Palacký University (in Czech).
  119. [Kulacka, 2010] Kulacka, A. (2010). The coefficients in the formula for the Menzerath- Altmann law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 17(4), 257-268. Go to original source...
  120. [Kulacka, Mačutek, 2007] Kulacka, A., Mačutek, J. (2007). A discrete formula for the Menzerath-Altmann law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 14(1), 23-32. Go to original source...
  121. [Lane, Hoffmeister, Bahan, 1996] Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., Bahan, B.A. (1996). Journey into the Deaf-World. San Diego: Dawn Sign Press.
  122. [Langer, 2006] Langer, J. (2006). Výuka znakového jazyka a multimédia [Teaching sign language and multimedia]. In: Pedagogicky´ software 2006. České Budějovice: Scientific Pedagogical Publishing, pp. 454-456. Avaliable at: http://www.uss.upol.cz/cz/clenove/profil/langer.
  123. [Langer, 2007] Langer, J. (2007). Nová funkce slovníků znakového jazyka [A new feature of sign language dictionaries]. Gong 36(3), 15-16. Avaliable at: http://www.uss.upol.cz/cz/clenove/profil/langer.
  124. [Langer, 2008] Langer, J. (2008). Obousměrný překlad v elektronických slovnících znakového jazyka [Bidirectional translation in electronic sign language dictionaries]. In: Pedagogický software 2008 [CD]. České Budějovice: Scientific Pedagogical Publishing, pp. 321-326. Avaliable at: http://www.uss.upol.cz/cz/clenove/profil/langer.
  125. [Langer, 2013] Langer, J. (2013). Znakové systémy v komunikaci neslyšících [Sign systems in communication of the Deaf]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  126. [Langer et al., 2020] Langer, J., Andres, J., Benešová, M., Faltýnek, D. (2020). Some aspects of a sign language quantitative analysis. To appear.
  127. [Langer, Rypka, 2017] Langer, J., Rypka, M. (2017). Testing of subjective perception of complexity of signs of Czech sign language. Journal of Exceptional People 11(2), 123-141.
  128. [Lawson, 1983] Lawson, L. (1983). Multichannel Signs. In: Kyle, J.G.; Woll, B. (eds.), Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language. London: Croom Helm, pp. 97-103.
  129. [Leopold, 2001] Leopold, E. (2001). Fractal structure in language. The question of the imbedding space. In: Köhler, R., Uhlířová, I.,Wimmer, G. (eds.), Text as a Linguistic Paradigm: Levels, Constituents, Constructs. Festschrift in honour of Luděk Hřebíček, Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 163-176.
  130. [Lillo-Martin, Gajewski, 2014] Lillo-Martin, D., Gajewski, J. (2014). One grammar or two? Sign Languages and the Nature of Human Language. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 5(4), 387-401. Go to original source...
  131. [Lorenz, Andres, Franck, 2017] Lorenz, W.E., Andres, J., Franck, G. (2017). Fractal aesthetics in architecture. AppliedMathematics & Information Sciences 11(4), 971-981. Go to original source...
  132. [Macurová, 1996] Macurová, A. (1996). Proč a jak zapisovat znaky českého znakového jazyka (Poznámky k diskusi) [Why and how to annotate signs of Czech Sign Language (Notes for discussion)]. Speciální pedagogika 6(1), 5-20.
  133. [Macurová, 1998] Macurová, A. (1998). Nad slovenským sborníkem "Štylistika neverbálnej komunikácie" [Above the Slovak anthology "Stylistics of nonverbal communication]. Speciální pedagogika 8(4), 56-59.
  134. [Macurová, 2001] Macurová, A. (2001). Poznáváme český znakový jazyk. (Úvodní poznámky) [We get to know Czech sign language. (Introductory remarks)]. Speciální pedagogika 11(2), 69-75.
  135. [Macurová, 2003] Macurová, A. (2003). Poznáváme český znakový jazyk IV. Vyjadřování času [We get to know Czech sign language IV. Expressing time]. Speciální pedagogika 13(2), 89-98.
  136. [Macurová, 2008] Macurová, A. (2008). Dějiny výzkumu znakového jazyka u nás a v zahraničí [History of sign language research at home and abroad]. 2nd edition. Praha: Česká komora tlumočník ů znakového jazyka.
  137. [Macurová, Bímová, 2001] Macurová, A., Bímová, P. (2001). Poznáváme český znakový jazyk II. (Slovesa a jejich typy) [We get to know Czech sign language II. (Verbs and their types)]. Speciální pedagogika 11(5), 285-296.
  138. [Macurová, Homoláčová, Ptáček, 1997] Macurová, A., Homoláčová, I., Ptáček, V. (1997). Výzkum komunikace neslyšících: český znakový jazyk [Deaf communication research: Czech sign language]. Speciální pedagogika 7(3), 1-15.
  139. [Malaia, 2017] Malaia, E. (2017). Current and future methodologies for quantitative analysis of information transfer in sign language and gesture data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40, E63. Go to original source...
  140. [Malaia, Borneman, Wilbur, 2016] Malaia, E., Borneman, J.D., Wilbur, R.B. (2016). Assessment of information content in visual signal: analysis of optical flow fractal complexity. Visual Cognition 24(3), 246-251. Go to original source...
  141. [Malaia, Borneman, Wilbur, 2018] Malaia, E., Borneman, J.D., Wilbur, R.B. (2018). Information transfer capacity of articulators in American Sign Language. Language and Speech 61(1), 97-112. Go to original source...
  142. [Mandelbrot, 1983] Mandelbrot, B.B. (1983). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman and Comp. Go to original source...
  143. [Mandelbrot, 1985] Mandelbrot, B.B., (1985). Self-affinity and fractal dimension. Physica Scripta 32, 257-260. Go to original source...
  144. [Mandelbrot, 2000] Mandelbrot, B.B. (2000). Les objects fractals. Forme, hazard et dimension. Paris: Flammarion.
  145. [Mandelbrot, 2007] Mandelbrot, B.B., (2007). The (Mis)Behavior of Markets, A Fractal View of 380 Risk, Ruin and Reward. New York: Basic Books.
  146. [Mandelbrot, Wallis, 1968] Mandelbrot, B.B.,Wallis, J.R., (1968). Noah, Joseph, and operational hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 4, 908-918. Go to original source...
  147. [Manin, 2009] Manin, D. Yu. (2009). Mandelbrot's model for Zipf's law: Can Mandelbrot's model explain Zipf's law for language? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 16(3), 274-285. Go to original source...
  148. [Mareš, Křivohlavý, 1995] Mareš, J., Křivohlavý, J. (1995). Komunikace ve škole [Communication at school]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  149. [Markov, 1913] Markov, A. A. (1913). Primer statisticheskogo issledovaniya nad tekstom "Evgeniya Onegina", illyustriruyuschijsvyaz' ispytanij v cep', Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, SPb, VI seriya, tom 7, 9 3, 153-162.
  150. [Massone, Curiel, 2004] Massone, M.I., Curiel, M. (2004). Sign Order in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5(1), 63-93. Avaliable at: http://muse.jhu.edu. Go to original source...
  151. [Mathesius, 1970] Mathesius, V. (1970). O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových [About potentiality of language phenomena]. In: Vachek, J. (ed.): U počátků pražské školy jazykovědné. Praha, p. 5-34.
  152. [Matlach, Faltýnek, 2016] Matlach, V., Faltýnek, D. (2016). Báze nejsou písmena [Bases are not letters]. In: Studie z aplikované lingvistiky 7(1), 20-38.
  153. [Meier, 2009] Meier, R.P. (2009) Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In: Meier, R.P., Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  154. [Montemurro, 2001] Montemurro, M.A. (2001). Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics. Physica A, 300, 567-578. Go to original source...
  155. [Montemurro, 2004] Montemurro, M.A. (2004). A generalization of the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in linguistics. In: Gell-Mann, M., Tsalis, C. (eds.), Nonextensive Entropy: Interdisciplinary Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347-356. Go to original source...
  156. [Montemurro, Pury, 2002] Montemurro, M.A., Pury, P.A. (2002). Long-range fractal correlations in literary corpora. Fractals 10(4), 451-461. Go to original source...
  157. [Montgomery, Peck, Vinig, 2006] Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., Vinig, G.G. (2006). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Fourth Edition,Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  158. [Moran, 1946] Moran, P.A.P. (1946). Additive functions of intervals and Hausdorff measure. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 42, 15-23. Go to original source...
  159. [Mosteller, Wallace, 1964] Mosteller, F., Wallace, D. L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship The Federalist. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
  160. [Motejzíková, 2007] Motejzíková, J. (2007) Simultánnost v českém znakovém jazyce [Simultaneity in Czech sign language]. Diploma thesis. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
  161. [Mrzílková, 1996] Mrzílková, M. (1996) Neslyšící - členové kultury a společenství neslyšících [Deaf-members of the culture and community of the deaf]. Speciální pedagogika 6(1), 21-24.
  162. [Natsopoulos, Abadzi, 1986] Natsopoulos, D., Abadzi, H. (1986). Understanding linguistic time sequence and simultaneity: A literature review and some new data. J. Psycholinguistic Research 15(3), 243-273. Go to original source...
  163. [Němec, 1971] Němec, I. (1971). Hláskoslovné předpoklady produktivity slovotvorných formantů v češtině (The Phonological Prerequisites for the Productiveness of Word- Formative Elements in Czech). Slovo a slovesnost 32(3), 217-224.
  164. [Nikolaou, 2014] Nikolaou, C. (2014). Menzerath-Altmann law in mammalian exons reflects the dynamics of gene structure evolution. Comput Biol Chem, Dec, 53, A, p. 134-143. Go to original source...
  165. [Niyogi, Berwick, 1995] Niyogi, P., Berwick, R. C. (1995). A note on Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA Regions. A. I. Memo, No. 1530, C.B.C.L. Paper No. 118. Go to original source...
  166. [Nováková, Šebková, 2008] Nováková, R., Šebková, H. (2008). Číslovky v českém znakovém jazyce - praktická cvičení [Numerals in Czech sign language-practical exercises]. Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka.
  167. [Okrouhlíková, Šebková, 2008] Okrouhlíková, L. (2008). Lexikografie a dostupné slovníky znakované češtiny [Lexicography and available dictionaries of signed Czech]. 2nd edition, Praha: Česká komora tlumočníkůu znakového jazyka.
  168. [Okrouhlíková, Šebková, 2012] Okrouhlíková, L. (2012). Notace - zápis českého znakového jazyka [Notation of Czech sign language]. Dissertation thesis, Pedagogická fakulta, Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
  169. [Pázman, 1988] Pázman, A. (1988). Foundations of Optimum Experimental Design. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster-Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Comp.
  170. [Peitgen, Jürgens, Saupe, 2004] Peitgen, H.O., Jürgens, H., Saupe, D., (2004). Chaos and Fractals. New Frontiers of Science. 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer. Go to original source...
  171. [Piantadosi, 2014] Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, 1112-1130. Go to original source...
  172. [Prün, 1994] Prün, C. (1994). Validity of Menzerath-Altmann's law: graphic representation of language, information processing systems and synergetic linguistics. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1(2), 148-155. Go to original source...
  173. [Rudman, 1998] Rudman, J. (1998). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities 31, 351-365. Go to original source...
  174. [Šebková, 2005] Šebková, H. (2005). Číslovky v českém znakovém jazyce [Numerals in Czech sign language]. Bachelor thesis, Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
  175. [Servusová, 2008] Servusová, J. (2008). Kontrastivní lingvistika - český jazyk × český znakový jazyk [Contrastive linguistics-Czech language × Czech sign language]. 2nd edition. Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka.
  176. [Sevinç, 2015] Sevinç, A.M. (2015). Finite-State Sign Language Morphophonology. PhD thesis, Graduate School of Informatics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  177. [Seydler, 1886] Seydler, A. (1886). Počet pravděpodobnosti v přítomném sporu [Probability calculus in a present conflict]. Athenaeum 3(7); 299-307.
  178. [Sgall et al., 1973] Sgall, P., Bémová, A., Benešová, E., Goralčíková, A., Hajičová, E., Machová, S., Panevová, J., Piťha, P., Říha, A., Vomáčka, I., Weisheitelová, J. (1973). Úvod do algebraické lingvistiky [Introduction to Algebraic Linguistics]. Praha: SPN.
  179. [Shahzad, Mittenthal, Caetano-Anollés, 2015] Shahzad, K., Mittenthal, J. E., Caetano- Anollés, G. (2015). The organization of domains in proteins obeys Menzerath- Altmann's law of language. BMC Systems Biology 9(44), 1-13. Go to original source...
  180. [Slánská-Bímová, Okrouhlíková, 2008] Slánská-Bímová, P., Okrouhlíková, L. (2008) Rysy přirozených jazyků - Český znakový jazyk jako přirozený jazyk, Lexikografie - Slovníky českého znakového jazyka [Features of natural languages-Czech sign language as a natural language, Lexicography-Dictionaries of Czech sign language]. 2nd edition, Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka.
  181. [Slobin et al., 2001a] Slobin, D. et al. (2001). Sign language transcription at the level of meaning components: The Berkeley Transcription System (BTS). Sign language and linguistics 4(1-2), 63-104. Go to original source...
  182. [Slobin et al., 2001b] Slobin, D. et al. (2001). The Berkeley Transcription System (BTS) Manual [online]. [cit. 2006-01-26]. Avaliable at: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/bts.pdf.
  183. [Souralová, 2004] Souralová, E. (2004). Znakový jazyk v komunikaci hluchoslepých [Sign language in deafblind communication]. Habilitation thesis, Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  184. [Štekauer, 2000] Štekauer, P. et al. (2000). Rudiments of English Linguistics. Prešov: Slovacontact.
  185. [Stewart, 2014] Stewart, J. (2014). A quantitative analysis of sign lengthening in American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 17(1), 82-101. Go to original source...
  186. [Stokoe, 1960] Stokoe, W.C. (1960). Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8).
  187. [Stokoe, 2005] Stokoe, W.C., (2005). Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, 3-37. Go to original source...
  188. [Strnadová, 2008] Strnadová, V. (2008). Specifické neverbální projevy neslyšících lidí [Specific non-verbal expressions of deaf people]. 2nd edition, Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka.
  189. [Svoboda, Krejčířová, Vágnerová, 2001] Svoboda, M., Krejčířová, D., Vágnerová, M. (2001). Psychodiagnostika dětí a dospívajících [Psychodiagnostics of children and adolescents]. Praha: Portál.
  190. [Swadesh, 1955] Swadesh, M. (1955). Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21, 121-137. Go to original source...
  191. [Tarcsiová, 2005] Tarcsiová, D. (2005). Komunikačný systém sluchovo postihnutých a spôsoby prekonávania ich komunikačnej bariéry [Communication system for the hearing impaired and ways to overcome their communication barrier]. Bratislava: Sapientia.
  192. [Tarcsiová, 2008] Tarcsiová, D. (2008). Pedagogika sluchovo postihnutých [Pedagogy of the hearing impaired]. Bratislava: MABAG.
  193. [Tetauerová 2008] Tetauerová, I. (2008). Mezinárodní znakový systém [International sign system]. 2nd editioin, Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka.
  194. [Těšitelová, 1987] Těšitelová, M. (1987). Kvantitativní lingvistika [Quantitative Linguistics]. Praha: SPN (in Czech).
  195. [Thode, 2002] Thode, H.C. (2002). Testing for Normality. New York: Marcel Dekker. Go to original source...
  196. [Tsonis, Elsner, Tsonis, 1997] Tsonis, A.A., Elsner, J.B., Tsonis, P.A. (1997). Is DNA a Language? Journal of Theoretical Biology 184(1), 25-29. Go to original source...
  197. [Tučková, 2010] Tučková, M. (2010). Optimal Design of Regression Experiments. Diploma Thesis, Olomouc: Palacký University (in Czech).
  198. [Tuldava, 1995] Tuldava, J. (1995). Methods in Quantitative Linguistics. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. Go to original source...
  199. [Universität Hamburg, 2020] Universität Hamburg (2020). Sign Language Notation System [online]. [2012-08-02]. Avaliable at: https://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/dgskorpus/index.php/welcome.html.
  200. [Uras, Verri, 1994] Uras, C., Verri, A. (1994). On the recognition of the alphabet of the sign language through size functions. In: Proceedings 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, Vol. II, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, pp. 334-338.
  201. [Uras, Verri, 1995] Uras, C., Verri, A. (1995). Sign language recognition: an application of the theory of size functions. In: Proceedings of the 6th British conference on Machine vision (Vol. 2), BMVA Press Surrey, Birmingham, UK, pp. 711-720. Go to original source...
  202. [Vašák, 1980] Vašák, P. (1980): Metody určování autorství literárních děl [Methods of Author Assigning of Literary Works]. Praha: Academia.
  203. [Vermeerbergen, Leeson, Crasborn, 2007] Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., Crasborn, O.A. (Eds.) (2007). Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Volume 28 of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Go to original source...
  204. [Volek, 2002] Volek, J. (2002). Úvod do komunikačních studií [Introduction to communication studies]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  205. [Vybíral, 2005] Vybíral, Z. (2005). Psychologie komunikace [Psychology of communication]. Praha: Portál.
  206. [Vysuček, 2008] Vysuček, P. (2008). Specifické znaky v českém znakovém jazyce [Specific signs in Czech sign language]. Praha: Česká komora tlumočníků znakového jazyka, (soubor).
  207. [Weron, 2002] Weron, R., (2002). Estimating long-range dependence: finite sample prop erties and confidence intervals. Physica A: StatisticalMechanics and its Applications 312, 285-299. Go to original source...
  208. [White, 1980] White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4), 817-838. Go to original source...
  209. [Wimmer, Altmann, 2005] Wimmer, G., Altmann, G. (2005). Unified derivation of some linguistic laws. In: Köhler, R., Altmann, G., Piotrowski, R.G. (eds.), Quantitative Linquistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 791-807.
  210. [Wimmer et al., 2003] Wimmer, G., Altmann, G., Hřebíček, L., Ondrejovič, S., Wimmerov á, S. (2003). Introduction to the Analysis of Texts. Bratislava: Veda (in Slovak).
  211. [Yule, 1938] Yule, G. U. (1938). On sentence-length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose, with application to two cases of disputed authorship. Biometrika 30, 363- 90. Go to original source...
  212. [Yule, 1944] Yule, G. U. (1944). The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  213. [Zhao, Zobel, 2005] Zhao, Y., Zobel, J. (2005). Effective and scalable authorship attribution using function words. In: Proceedings of 2nd Asian Information Retrieval Symposium, 3689 of LNCS, pp. 174-189. Go to original source...
  214. [Zipf, 1949] Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley Press.