ISBN: 978-80-244-6006-2 | ISBN online: 978-80-244-6007-9 | DOI: 10.5507/ff.21.24460062

Aktuální tanečněvědný diskurz

Obraty v současném tanci

Jitka Pavlišová, Barbora Liška, Tereza Richterová, Albina Feofilaktova


This theoretically-analytical publication focuses on the theatrical dance and its transformations during the last decades. Through several individual studies, it targets especially the phenomenon of so-called turns (installative, ecological, posthuman and archival), which define the latest development of dance. The research relies on fundamental foreign theoretical concepts which have been absent in the Czech academic dance studies discourse so far. The authors of this publication thus aim at establishing and reflecting these concepts in the domestic environment as well.

1. edition, Published: 2021, online: 2021, publisher: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Křížkovského 8, 771 47 Olomouc



References

  1. ARISTOTELES, 1962. Poetika. Praha: Orbis.
  2. BAUER, Bojana, 2015. Propensity: Pragmatics and Functions of Dramaturgy in Contemporary Dance. In: HANSEN, Pil, CALLISON, Darcey (ed.). Dance Dramaturgy: Modes of Agency, Awareness and Engegement. London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 31‒50. Go to original source...
  3. BLEEKER, Maaike, 2015. Thinking No-One's Thought. In: HANSEN, Pil, CALLISON, Darcey (ed.). Dance Dramaturgy: Modes of Agency, Awareness and Engegement. London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 67‒86.
  4. CONOLLY, Mary Kate, 2013. "An Introduction to Raimund Hoghe." In: CONOLLY, Mary Kate (ed.). Throwing the Body into Flight: A Portrait of Raimund Hoghe. London: Intellect. Go to original source...
  5. CVEJIĆ, Bojana, 2010. Dramaturgy: A Friendship of Problems, TkH Dance/Theories-Reloaded 18, s. 46‒53.
  6. DELEUZE, Gilles, GUATTARI, Félix, 2010. Tisíc plošin. Praha: Herrmann & synové.
  7. DELEUZE, Gilles, GUATTARI, Félix, 1994. What is Philosophy?. London: Verso.
  8. HANSEN, Pil, 2015. Introduction. In: HANSEN, Pil, CALLISON, Darcey (ed.). Dance Dramaturgy: Modes of Agency, Awareness and Engegement. London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 31‒50.
  9. HUSCHKA, Sabine, 2012. Moderner Tanz. Konzepte Stile Utopien. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
  10. KAŠPAROVÁ, Barbora, 2018. Tanztheater - taneční divadlo (nevšední) všednosti: od Kurta Joosse k Pině Bausch. Theatralia, 21, 1, s. 89-112. Go to original source...
  11. LEHMANN, Hans-Thies, PRIMAVESI, Patrick, 2016. Dramaturgy on shifting grounds. In: ROMANSKA, Magda (ed.). Routledge Companion to Dramaturgy. 1. London: Routledge, s. 169-172.
  12. LEPECKI, André, 2001. Dance without distance. Ballet Tanz International 2, s. 29-31.
  13. NOETH, Sandra, 2011. Protocols of Encounter: On Dance Dramaturgy. In: NOETH, Sandra, KLEIN, Gabriele (ed.). Emerging Bodies: The Performance of Worldmaking in Dance and Choreography. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, s. 247-256. Go to original source...
  14. PAVIS, Patrice, 2003. Divadelní slovník. Praha: Divadelní ústav.
  15. PAVIS, Patrice, 2016. The Routledge Dictionary of Performance and Contemporary Theatre. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  16. PAVLIŠOVÁ, Jitka, 2018. "Tanec-koncept", "ne-tanec" nebo "nová choreografie"?. ArteActa, 1, s. 5‒22. Go to original source...
  17. PLOEBST, Helmut, 2001. No wind no word. Neue Choreographie in der Gesellschaft des Spektakels/ New choreography in the society of the spectacle. München: Kieser Verlag.
  18. PROFETA, Katherine, 2015. Dramaturgy in Motion: At Work on Dance and Movement Performance. London: Wisconsin Press.
  19. VAN KERKHOVEN, Marianne, 2002. Focus Raimund Hoghe. [online]. [cit 7. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: Raimundhoghe.com/en/focus_en.html
  20. VAN KERKHOVEN, Marianne, 1994. On Dramaturgy. Introduction and Table of Contents. Theaterschrift, no. 5 a 6, s. 8-34.
  21. VAN KERKHOVEN, Marianne, 1999. Van de kleine en de grote dramaturgie. Etcetera, vol. 17, no. 68, s. 67-69.
  22. BELL, Biba, 2014. Slow Work: Dance's temporal effort in the visual sphere. Performance Research 19, č. 3. s. 129-134. Go to original source...
  23. BISHOP, Claire, 2005. Installation Art a Critical History. London.
  24. BISHOP, Claire, 2018. Black Box, White Cube, Gray Zone: Dance exhibitions and Audience Attention. The Drama Review 62, č. 2, s. 22-42. Go to original source...
  25. BRANDSTETTER, Gabriele, 2017. Klidový stav/pohyb. In: DVOŘÁKOVÁ, Dita (ed.). Tanec, prostor a světlo. Brno: Janáčkova akademie múzických umění v Brně.
  26. EIERMANN, André, 2009. Postspektakuläres Theater. Die Alterität der Aufführung und die Entgrenzung der Künste. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Go to original source...
  27. CVEJIĆ, Bojana, 2014. Giving Time Without Losing It Interview with Xavier Le Roy. In: CVEJIĆ, Bojana (ed.). "Rétrospective" by Xavier le Roy. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.
  28. FISCHER-LICHTE, Erika, 2011. Estetika performativity. Mníšek pod Brdy: Na konári.
  29. FORSYTHE, William, 2011. Choreographic objects. In: SPIER, Steven (ed.). William Forsythe and the Practice of Choreography. New York: Routledge.
  30. GAENSHEIMER, Susanne, KRAMER, Mario (ed.)., 2016. William Forsythe: The Fact of Matter. Bielefeld: Kerber Verlag.
  31. PAVLIŠOVÁ, Jitka, 2015. Sasha Waltz: Mezi taneční performancí, instalací a plastic art. Taneční zóna 19, č. 2, s. 39-43.
  32. REBENTISCH, Juliane, 2012. Aesthetics of Installation Art. Berlin: Sternberk Press.
  33. RIEDEL, Christiane, 2014. A new unity of performance and exhibition. In: RIEDEL, Christiane, WALTZ, Yoreme, WEIBEL, Peter (ed.). Sasha Waltz: Installations Objects Performances. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
  34. ROSENTHAL, Stephanie (ed.), 2010. Move. Choreographing You: Art and Dance Since the 1960s. London: Hayward Publishing.
  35. SPIER, Steven, 2011. Choreographic thinking and amateur bodies. In: SPEIR, Steven (ed.). William Forsythe and the Practice of Choreography. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  36. WEIBEL, Peter, 2014. Sasha Waltz. Installations, objects, performances - between "performative turn" and "installative turn". In: RIEDEL, Christiane, WALTZ, Yoreme, WEIBEL, Peter (ed.). Sasha Waltz: Installations Objects Performances. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
  37. WOOKEY, Sara, 2015. WHO CARES? Dance in the Gallery & Museum. London: Siobhan Davies Dance.
  38. WORTHEN, B. William, 2018. Designing the Spectator in Immersive Theatre. In: ARONSON, Arnold (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Scenography. London: Routledge.
  39. Arcolatheatre web. [online] 06. 3. 2019. [cit 10. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.arcolatheatre.com/about/sustainability/
  40. BROWN, Wendy, 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books. Go to original source...
  41. CHAUDHURI, Una. "There Must Be a Lot of Fish in That Lake": Toward an Ecological Theater. 1994. Dostupné online [cit 10. 10. 2020]: https://www.academia.edu/4311607/There_Must_Be_a_Lot_of_Fish_in_That_Lake_Toward_an_Ecological_Theater?auto=download Go to original source...
  42. CHERKAOUI, Sidi Larbi, UYTTERHOEVEN, Lise, 2014. On Collaboration and Navigating between Dance Cultures. An Ethics of Reconciliation. In: COOLS, Guy, GIELEN, Pascal. The Ethics of Art, Ecological Turns in the Performing Arts. Amsterdam: Valiz, s. 247-258.
  43. COOLS, Guy, GIELEN, Pascal, 2014. The Ethics of Art, Ecological Turns in the Performing Arts. Amsterdam: Valiz.
  44. FISCHER-LICHTE, Erika, 2012. Estetika performativity. Mníšek po Brdy: Na Konári.
  45. GUATTARI, Felix, 2008. The Three Ecologies. Londýn: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
  46. HAECKEL, Ernst, 2010. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Berlín: De Gruyter.
  47. HENDRICKX, Sébastien, VERDONCK, Benjamin, 2014. On the "Manifesto for the Active Participation of the Performing Arts Sector in the Transition towards a Fair Durability". In: COOLS, Guy, GIELEN, Pascal, The Ethics of Art, Ecological Turns in the Performing Arts. Amsterdam: Valiz, s. 109-126.
  48. INGVARTSEN, Mette, 2013. The Artificial Nature Project - Or how to make choreography for nonhuman performers. [online] 06. 3. 2013. [cit 10. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.metteingvartsen.net/texts_interviews/the-artificial-nature-project-or-how-to-make-choreography-for-non-human-performers/
  49. JACKSON, Naomi M, 2014. Ecology, Dance Presenting, and Social Justice. In: COOLS, Guy, GIELEN, Pascal. The Ethics of Art, Ecological Turns in the Performing Arts. Amsterdam: Valiz, s. 197-226.
  50. KOLÁŘSKÝ, Rudolf, SUŠA, Oleg, 1998. Filosofie a současná ekologická krize. Morální a politická filosofie; sv. 5, 1. vyd. Praha: Filosofia.
  51. KREBS, C. J, 1972. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
  52. LAMSER, Zdeněk, 2018. Sociologický slovník. [online] 10. 11. 2018. [cit 10. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://encyklopedie.soc.cas.cz/w/Ekologie
  53. LAZZARATO, Maurizio, 2014. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  54. LEPECKI, André, 2016. Singularities: Dance in the Age of Performance. Oxfordshire: Routledge. Go to original source...
  55. MIDGARD FIKSDAL, Ingri, 2019. Affective Choreographies. Oslo: National Academy of the Arts.
  56. MORTON, Timothy, 2009. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
  57. NELLIS, Steff, 2019. Voice Of Nature: The Trial - Maria Lucia Cruz Correia. [online] 06. 3. 2019. [cit 10. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://e-tcetera.be/voice-of-nature-the-trial-maria-lucia-cruz-correia/
  58. ODUM, Eugene, 1975. Ecology, the link between the natural and the social sciences (Modern biology series) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  59. ONDOK, Josef Petr, 1998. Člověk a příroda: hledání etického vztahu. Kostelní Vydří: Karmelitánské nakladatelství.
  60. PEETERS, Jeroen, 2014. Imagination, Experience and Meaning as Quality of Life. In: COOLS, Guy, GIELEN, Pascal. The Ethics of Art. Ecological Turns in the Performing Arts. Amsterdam: Valiz, s. 89-107.
  61. SOMVIELE, Charlotte De, 2019. In het Amazonewoud ruik je geen jungle meer, maar olie [online] 28. 2. 2019. [cit 10. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20190227_04214424
  62. ŠMAJS, Josef, 1995. Ohrožená kultura. Od evoluční ontologie k ekologické politice. Brno: Zvláštní vydání.
  63. BACHTIN, Michail Michajlovič, 2007. François Rabelais a lidová kultura středověku a renesance. Praha: Argo.
  64. BOOKCHIN, Natalie, MEIXNEROVÁ, Marie (ed.), 2014. ♯mm net art - internetové umění ve virtuálním a fyzickém prostoru prezentace. Olomouc: Pastiche Filmz PAF.
  65. BRAIDOTTI, Rosi, 2013. Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  66. BRAIDOTTI, Rosi, 1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  67. BRANDSTETTER, Gabriele, 1998. Defigurative Choreography: From Marcel Duchamp to William Forsythe. TDR. 42(4), 37-55. Go to original source...
  68. COLEBROOK, Claire, 2016. How Queer Can You Go? Theory, Normality and Normativity. In: HIRD, Myra J., GIFFNEY, Noreen (ed.). Queering the Non/Human. London: Routledge.
  69. COOPER ALBRIGHT, Ann, 2001. Strategic Abilities: Negotiating the Disabled Body in Dance. In: DILS, Ann, COOPER ALBRIGHT, Ann (ed.). Moving History/Dancing Cultures: A Dance History Reader. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
  70. DE SPAIN, Kent, 2000. Dance and Technology: A Pas de Deux for Post-Humans. Dance Research Journal. 32(1), s. 2-17. DOI: 10.2307/1478270. Go to original source...
  71. DELEUZE, Gilles, GUATTARI, Félix, 2010. Tisíc plošin. Praha: Herrmann a synové.
  72. GIL, José, 1998. Metamorphoses of the Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  73. GIL, José, 2006. Paradoxical Body. DR: The Drama Review. 50(4), 21-35. Go to original source...
  74. HALL, Joshua. M, 2018. Philosophy of dance and disability. Philosophy Compass. 13, s. 1-10. DOI:10.1111/phc3.12551. Go to original source...
  75. HARAWAY, Donna, 2016. Companion Species, Mis-recognition, and Queer Worlding. In: HIRD, Myra J., GIFFNEY, Noreen (ed.). Queering the Non/Huhman. London: Routledge.
  76. HARAWAY, Donna, 2002. "Manifest kyborgů: Věda, technologie a socialistický feminismus ke konci dvacátého století". In: BARŠA, Pavel (ed.). Sborník prací Fakulty sociálních studií brněnské univerzity - Sociální studia 7. Brno: FSS MU, s. 51-58.
  77. HARAWAY, Donna, 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  78. HAUER, Tomáš, 2002. S/krze postmodernî teorie. Praha: Karolinum.
  79. HAYLES, Katherine, 2000. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies In Cybernetics, Literature, And Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  80. HIRD, Myra J., GIFFNEY, Noreen (ed.), 2016. Queering the Non/Human. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  81. INGVARTSEN, Mette, 2016. Expanded Choreography: Shifting the agency of movement in The Artificial Nature Project and 69 positions. Stockholm: Stockholm University of the Arts.
  82. JAGOSE, Annamarie, 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  83. JANOŠČÍK, Václav (ed.) 2015. Objekt. Praha: Kvalitář.
  84. KURZWEIL, Ray, 2006. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. London: Penguin Books.
  85. LEPECKI, André, 2016. Limithropies of the human: Monstrums nature, thingly life, and the wild animal. In: LEPECKI, André (ed.). Singularities: Dance in the Age of Performance. London: Routledge, 2016. Go to original source...
  86. MACCORMACK, Patricia, 2017a Posthuman Ethics: Embodiment and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  87. MACCORMACK, Patricia, 2017b. Queer Posthumanism: Cyborgs, Animals, Monsters, Perverts. In: GIFFNEY, Noreen, O'ROURKE, Michael (ed.). The Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory. London: Routledge.
  88. MACEK, Jakub, 2003. Tělesnost a kyberkultura. Revue pro média. 5, s. 2-9.
  89. MARTINOVÁ, Marta, METELEC, Matěj, RYCHETSKÝ, Lukáš (ed.), 2020. Post A2. Praha: A2.
  90. PAVIS, Patrice, 2016. The Routledge Dictionary of Performance and Contemporary Theatre. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  91. PEPPERELL, Robert, 2005 The Posthuman Manifesto. Kritikos [online]. 2. [cit. 18. 7. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.intertheory.org/pepperell.htm
  92. THAIN, Alanna, 2008. The in-Tensions of Extensions: Compagnie Marie Chouinard's bODY Remix gOLDBERG vARIATIONS. Differences. 19 (1), s. 71-95. Go to original source...
  93. ULRICH, Jessica, 2017. Art for Animal Audiences [online]. [cit. 15. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.performancesforpets.net/text/
  94. AGAMBEN, Giorgio, 2002. Was von Auschwitz bleibt. Das Archiv und der Zeuge. [Remnants of Auschwitz, 1998]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  95. BISMARCK, Beatrice von, 2013. Steps and Gaps: Curatorial Perspectives on Dance and Archive. In: BRANDSTETTER, Gabriele a Gabriele KLEIN (eds). Dance [and] Theory. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, s. 213-217. Go to original source...
  96. CARLSON, Marvin, 2003. The Haunted Stage. The Theatre as Memory Machine. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  97. DE CERTEAU, Michel, 2009. Der Raum des Archivs oder die Perversion der Zeit. In: EBELING, Knut a Stefan GÜNZEL. Archivologie. Theorien des Archivs in Philosophie, Medien und Künsten. Berlin: Kadmos, s. 113-122.
  98. DERRIDA, Jacques, 1995. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  99. FOELLMER, Susanne, 2020. The Archival Turn in Dance/Studies. Reflections on (Corporeal) Archives and Documents. In: DAVID, Ann R., Michael HUXLEY a Sarah WHATLEY (eds.). Dance Fields. Staking a Claim for Dance Studies in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire: Dance Books Ltd, s. 249-273.
  100. FOSTER, Hal, 2004. An Archival Impulse. October 110, s. 3-22 [cit. 22. 11. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3397555 Go to original source...
  101. FOUCAULT, Michel, 1989. The Archeology of Knowledge [1969]. New York: Routledge.
  102. FRANKO, Mark, 2019. Epilogue to an Epilogue: Historicizing the Re- in Dance Reenactment. In: WONG, Yutian a Jens Richard GIERSDORF. The Routledge Dance Studies Reader. 3. vydání. New York: Routledge, s. 93-104. Go to original source...
  103. LEPECKI, André, 2010. The Body as Archive: Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances. Dance Research Journal 2, vol. 42, s. 28-48. Go to original source...
  104. MATZKE, Anemarie, 2012. Bilder in Bewegung bringen. Zum Reenactment als politischer und choreographischer Praxis. In: ROSELT, Jens a Otto ULF (Hgs.). Theater als Zeitmaschine. Zur performativen Praxis des Reenactments. Theater- und kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, s. 125-139. Go to original source...
  105. PAVLIŠOVÁ, Jitka a Barbora LIŠKA, 2021. Diskurz tance / diskurz o tanci: Současné tendence německé taneční vědy. Theatralia 2 (v tisku). Go to original source...
  106. ROKEM, Freddie, 2000. Performing History. Theatrical Representations of the Past in Contemporary Theatre. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
  107. TAYLOR, Diana, 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire. Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
  108. UMATHUM, Sandra, 2012. Seven Easy Pieces oder von der Kunst, die Geschichte der Performance Art zu schreiben. In: ROSELT, Jens a Otto ULF (Hgs.). Theater als Zeitmaschine. Zur performativen Praxis des Reenactments. Theater- und kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, s. 101-125. Go to original source...
  109. ŽIŽEK, Slavoj, 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London, New York: Verso.